The Lawfare Project logo

The Lawfare Project

@lawfareproject

USA

Unclaimed

We are a global network of legal professionals who contribute our skills, time and expertise to defending the civil and human rights of the Jewish people, and fighting discrimination wherever we see it.

Listed by the directory from public sources. Not yet claimed by The Lawfare Project.

Claiming is free and takes a minute: a Verified badge, your own photo, bio and links, and a stronger place in the rankings.

About Israel and the Jewish world.

The Lawfare Project@lawfareproject

NEW LAWSUIT: Man arrested while holding Israeli flag sues Montreal and four police officers. With support from The Lawfare Project, Daniel Bercovici is suing the City of Montreal and four Montreal police officers over his arrest at the Grand Prix Cycliste de Montréal on

46640
The Lawfare Project6d ago

NEW LAWSUIT: Man arrested while holding Israeli flag sues Montreal and four police officers. With support from The Lawfare Project, Daniel Bercovici is suing the City of Montreal and four Montreal police officers over his arrest at the Grand Prix Cycliste de Montréal on September 14, 2025. According to the lawsuit, Bercovici was peacefully holding an Israeli flag in support of the Israel Premier Tech cycling team while approximately 200 anti-Israel demonstrators protested its participation. Within seconds of approaching Bercovici, officers allegedly pushed him along the barrier and took him to the ground, injuring and arresting him. The lawsuit also alleges that demonstrators attempted to strike him with flagpoles, yet no arrests were made or investigation opened concerning those attempts. The lawsuit further alleges that officers filed materially false reports that are contradicted by video evidence and led to Bercovici’s prosecution for obstructing a peace officer. More than ten months later, prosecutors withdrew the charge, expressly because of video evidence provided by the defense, according to the filing. Bercovici is represented by Michael Hollander and Neil G. O. of Spiegel Ryan LLP . “The right to stand peacefully in a public place with an Israeli flag cannot depend on whether a hostile crowd approves of the message.” — Benjamin Ryberg, Attorney and Chief Operating Officer, The Lawfare Project Want to help fund the lawsuit? Join the fight by visiting https://lnkd.in/deVzVhS

4 likes · 0 comments · 0 reposts

Open on LinkedIn ↗

The Lawfare ProjectInstagram6d

NEW LAWSUIT: Man arrested while holding Israeli flag sues Montreal and four police officers. With support from The Lawfare Project, Daniel Bercovici is suing the City of Montreal and four Montreal police officers over his arrest at the Grand Prix Cycliste de Montréal on September 14, 2025. According to the lawsuit, Bercovici was peacefully holding an Israeli flag in support of the Israel Premier Tech cycling team while approximately 200 anti-Israel demonstrators protested its participation. Within seconds of approaching Bercovici, officers allegedly pushed him along the barrier and took him to the ground, injuring and arresting him. The lawsuit also alleges that demonstrators attempted to strike him with flagpoles, yet no arrests were made or investigation opened concerning those attempts. The lawsuit further alleges that officers filed materially false reports that are contradicted by video evidence and led to Bercovici’s prosecution for obstructing a peace officer. More than ten months later, prosecutors withdrew the charge, expressly because of video evidence provided by the defense, according to the filing. Bercovici is represented by Michael Hollander and Neil G. Oberman of Spiegel Ryan LLP. “The right to stand peacefully in a public place with an Israeli flag cannot depend on whether a hostile crowd approves of the message.” — Benjamin Ryberg, Attorney and Chief Operating Officer, The Lawfare Project Want to help fund the lawsuit? Join the fight by visiting thelawfareproject.org

The Lawfare Project@lawfareproject

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 SCOTLAND: Students plot to exclude Zionists from university societies An exclusionary membership rule of the kind proposed would breach the Equality Act of 2010, and the University, to its credit, has said as much. Calling for a “Zionist-free campus” is discrimination

1710609
The Lawfare Project@lawfareproject

On October 7, we are fighting back. Lawfare Project is suing the New School. Three years after the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, Jew-hatred has not disappeared. It followed Jewish students into classrooms, studios, hallways, and campuses. Today, we fight back with

1316549
The Lawfare Project@lawfareproject

🇧🇪 BELGIUM: Authorities are now establishing a direct link between Iran and several attacks that targeted Jewish interests in the country in March. Gert Vercauteren, director of the Coordination Unit for Threat Analysis (OCAM), stated that the perpetrators had “certainly”

22211
The Lawfare Project1mo ago

Lawfare Project’s Gerard Filitti provided comment to Fox News Digital on shareholder lawsuit against the New York Times for anti-Israel bias. Gerard Filitti, senior counsel with The Lawfare Project, a Jewish civil and human rights organization, described the case in more detail in comments to Fox News Digital. “In May, The Lawfare Project sent The New York Times a seven-page retraction demand on the [Nicholas] Kristof column, documenting that the column’s primary source is chaired by a man on Israel’s list of Hamas operatives who called the October 7 attackers ‘heroic knights,’ and that its validating expert left UCLA amid sexual harassment allegations involving minors,” Filitti said. “The Times’ deputy general counsel answered that he saw ‘no basis for a retraction or correction’ because the story ‘was carefully edited and fact-checked.’ Yet less than two months later, the paper’s executive editor said the newsroom ‘wouldn’t have done that exact piece,’” he continued. “Shortly after our demand, the paper’s own shareholders asked a narrower question – whether anyone above the editors checks that the Times follows its own written standards — and the Times refused to even provide them with the charters and standards handbook it already publishes. “The petition filed today puts the Times’ credibility in front of a judge, along with a record the paper has refused to answer anywhere else: 72 errors the paper admitted in eight months of war coverage, 48 of them about Israel; a front-page caption calling a Gaza child ‘born healthy’ that the paper walked back five days later; a columnist who quoted his own campaign donors in at least a dozen columns without telling readers; a 10-year Jewish employee told by Human Resources, according to the petition, to ‘go find a place whose values align with yours;’ and a federal jury that found the Times liable for defamation on August 20, the paper’s first loss at trial in more than fifty years,” Filitti added. https://lnkd.in/gBNvRMiN

3 likes · 0 comments · 0 reposts

Open on LinkedIn ↗

The Lawfare ProjectInstagram24 Sep 2026

Gerard Filitti, senior counsel with The Lawfare Project, a Jewish civil and human rights organization, described the case in more detail in comments to Fox News Digital. “In May, The Lawfare Project sent The New York Times a seven-page retraction demand on the [Nicholas] Kristof column, documenting that the column’s primary source is chaired by a man on Israel’s list of Hamas operatives who called the October 7 attackers ‘heroic knights,’ and that its validating expert left UCLA amid sexual harassment allegations involving minors,” Filitti said. “The Times’ deputy general counsel answered that he saw ‘no basis for a retraction or correction’ because the story ‘was carefully edited and fact-checked.’ Yet less than two months later, the paper’s executive editor said the newsroom ‘wouldn’t have done that exact piece,’” he continued. “Shortly after our demand, the paper’s own shareholders asked a narrower question – whether anyone above the editors checks that the Times follows its own written standards — and the Times refused to even provide them with the charters and standards handbook it already publishes. “The petition filed today puts the Times’ credibility in front of a judge, along with a record the paper has refused to answer anywhere else: 72 errors the paper admitted in eight months of war coverage, 48 of them about Israel; a front-page caption calling a Gaza child ‘born healthy’ that the paper walked back five days later; a columnist who quoted his own campaign donors in at least a dozen columns without telling readers; a 10-year Jewish employee told by Human Resources, according to the petition, to ‘go find a place whose values align with yours;’ and a federal jury that found the Times liable for defamation on August 20, the paper’s first loss at trial in more than fifty years,” Filitti added.

The Lawfare Project@lawfareproject

Judge tosses lawsuit accusing Jewish couple of getting Muslim lawyer fired over anti-Israel posts A federal judge in Florida has dismissed a lawsuit from a Muslim attorney who accused a Jewish couple of conspiring to get her fired by publicizing her anti-Israel social media

3611566

Voices like The Lawfare Project

See the rankings