Videos > Israel Matters #4: Explosion in Iran: BREAKING NEWS ANALYSIS! Israel Matters #4: Explosion in Iran: BREAKING NEWS ANALYSIS! Pesach Wolicki 449 views • 11 likes • 4 comments 6 years ago • 30:52 min
Transcript [00:01] hey welcome back everyone to Israel [00:04] matters where we discuss the matters [00:06] that matter most to Israel and as always [00:10] I'm rabbi Pesach lucky and I'm here with [00:13] with Elliott showed off and we are we [00:17] started discussing Iran we finished up [00:21] dealing with Russia and and what Iran [00:23] and Russia are up to in Syria but before [00:28] we get there you had mentioned to me [00:29] that you wanted to comment on something [00:31] that we discussed last time yes [00:34] specifically about the the scriptural [00:36] part of our talk last week I was giving [00:39] giving some thought about and first I [00:41] have to say that I'm one of those guys [00:44] who and I'm pretty sure you agree with [00:46] me that believe that there there is no [00:49] good translation of scripture they start [00:53] with not so good and they work their way [00:55] down from there yeah the way I always [00:57] put it is that every translation is a [01:00] commentary I'm not anti translations but [01:05] we have to understand that and [01:06] translators know this a translators job [01:08] is really to interpret because nothing [01:12] can ever substitute the original [01:13] language right I think that's true in [01:15] any literature certainly we're talking [01:17] about scripture and not only God's Word [01:20] but God's words yeah so to drill down [01:24] anyway we were you were talking last [01:26] week about um [01:27] 23rd psalm and there were a whole bunch [01:32] of parts of that verse but I want to [01:34] focus on two of them to sort of expand [01:38] on the lesson that you gave last time [01:40] the first is what is generally [01:43] translated as I shall fear no evil the [01:46] Hebrew lo Iran doesn't really translate [01:50] that way I if I were to translate your [01:56] other rabbi so correct me if I've got [01:58] this wrong it's more I will not fear bad [02:08] correct okay [02:11] did not is the nut is to fear not to the [02:14] object and rah is really bad something [02:18] bad happening not evil in the sense that [02:20] we normally use the word evil baby okay [02:24] okay I'm listening okay further on thy [02:30] rod and thy staff comfort me the Hebrew [02:35] you know how Muni could be comfort but [02:37] it's more to console me that's true yeah [02:41] okay [02:42] so here's here's what I'm thinking when [02:44] I put this together [02:46] there are many chapters in Psalms that [02:50] talk about God's protection 91 being one [02:56] of the classics but certainly far from [02:58] the only one where talks about I'll I [03:00] will guard you or one guardian 21 right [03:05] okay with where shomare is used to guard [03:09] em again to field and so on here it [03:14] seems to say something different that [03:17] even though I go through this place of [03:19] danger and I don't want to define but [03:21] valley of the shadow of death I will not [03:26] not fear bad because you will console me [03:30] because even if it happens to me I will [03:33] not fear it because we only get consoled [03:37] if some tragedy has already occurred [03:40] actly ah so I am NOT a even if I mean [03:44] it's not that I'm not gonna fear it [03:46] because you're gonna prevent it it's I'm [03:48] not gonna fear it because even if it [03:50] happens I know that in the aftermath you [03:53] will show me oh wow that's a powerful [03:56] insight that's a powerful spiritual [03:58] insight good like you know in terms of [04:00] drawing drawing some some sustenance [04:03] from from this wow that's very powerful [04:05] thank you Wow [04:07] alright um okay that's something to [04:10] think about you know we can you can [04:11] pause the video right now and meditate [04:13] on that you know Elliot if I could draw [04:18] us back into Syria yes yes Iran I mean [04:21] we're you know we're talking Iran's role [04:24] in Syria is not unconnected it's part of [04:27] the larger role that it's playing in the [04:29] world as a bad actor in terms of what [04:31] it's doing in in the Gulf and what it's [04:34] doing and what it's and and and the [04:36] saber-rattling that is constantly going [04:38] on between it in Saudi Arabia and [04:40] everything that Iran is involved in is [04:42] all connected and Hamas I'm Chris bola [04:45] it's all the same you so we had a [04:47] headline you know if we could just tie [04:49] this conversation into what's happening [04:51] right now there's a headline in the [04:53] papers basically today that there was a [04:55] large explosion of course unexplained [04:59] that's the way it goes there was a large [05:01] explosion that took place near near [05:04] Parchin near the base of Parchin which [05:07] is where they're trying to develop [05:09] nuclear nuclear weapons I saw another [05:12] headline from just a couple days ago [05:13] about how their enrichment of uranium [05:15] has is really reaching a critical stage [05:18] you know what maybe talk about that and [05:22] then bring us bring us back into how [05:23] this impacts Israel okay so first of all [05:26] the reports and again this is something [05:29] that only happens less than 12 hours ago [05:34] the reports are that there was a massive [05:36] explosion either near or in the base [05:39] that's that's not clear it was visible [05:43] from Tehran which is some 20 kilometers [05:46] that's this isn't this isn't a bomb this [05:51] isn't like if something is if an [05:55] explosion just for anybody's not [05:57] familiar it should be obvious it for an [05:59] explosion to be sensed 20 kilometers [06:02] away we're talking about something very [06:03] significant they saw the fireball 20 [06:06] kilometers away they heard the boom so [06:12] this was something massive it wasn't a [06:14] building blowing up the Iranian regime [06:19] they couldn't hide it obviously claimed [06:22] that it was a gas reservoir explosion [06:27] and that nobody was injured that's [06:30] that's their line that's what they're [06:32] sticking to at the moment and that [06:34] nothing on the base was damaged and so [06:37] on [06:38] given that this is a regime that lies [06:43] automatically I take any statement that [06:48] they make with a grain of salt even if [06:49] it's true definitely that this is one of [06:51] the problems of a lying regime that it's [06:57] possible but there are a few things here [07:01] that make it let's say that make another [07:04] hypothesis interesting and also very [07:08] much possible one is that it occurred at [07:11] Parchin which is really a one of the key [07:16] targets the International Atomic Energy [07:20] Authority has not been allowed to [07:23] supervise to investigate there other [07:26] words something something's going on [07:28] there that the Iranians don't want [07:30] anybody note that's first of all and and [07:34] nuclear comes to mind very quickly it's [07:36] a place where we know that they've been [07:37] dug they've done nuclear research the [07:40] fact that it happened in the middle of [07:42] the night [07:45] has two possible explanations to either [07:49] to support their story or not one is [07:53] that in the middle of the night you're [07:55] on a skeleton crew it's possible that [07:57] some sort of error happens that causes [07:59] an accident that's a possibility for an [08:05] accident you know there's so many [08:07] security measures and and and and like [08:11] layers of for some accident to happen [08:15] off off work hours to produce such a [08:19] massive explosion I mean this isn't you [08:22] know it we think that way kind of like [08:24] almost like from like you know evil men [08:27] in comic books who have like underground [08:30] headquarter [08:31] how can an accident like that happen in [08:34] the middle of the night how could an [08:35] accident happen at Sherman Chernobyl [08:37] accident at Chernobyl decades ago and [08:40] you know and you think that not [08:42] advocating their hypothesis I'm saying [08:44] okay it's it's within the realm of [08:48] possible and I don't ok I don't I don't [08:52] to reject it out of hand on the other [08:56] hand if it were a strike to hit [08:59] something and the fact that it's at [09:01] Parchin already you know points [09:03] something in that direction because [09:05] that's that's one of the data points you [09:07] have to take into account it doesn't [09:08] just happen at random it's not at some [09:10] some place out in the middle of nowhere [09:12] striking in the middle of the night [09:14] makes sense because if you don't want to [09:16] inflict lots of casualties that's when [09:17] you would do it [09:19] it's also when when systems tend to be [09:23] more down in general even if even if [09:26] there are alerts meaning if this was if [09:30] this was someone trying to strike at the [09:33] Iranians correct this would be the [09:35] that's when their defenses are down and [09:37] that's when it's it's easier to operate [09:40] undetected defenses in the sense yeah [09:44] defense in the sense that people are [09:46] behind all defenses even electronic [09:48] technological ones and midnight one [09:51] o'clock in the morning is when people [09:54] are not as alert as they are eleven [09:57] twelve o'clock in the morning noon time [10:00] and air strike missile strike ground [10:05] strike cyber strike I mean the today you [10:13] can't rule anything out but it would [10:15] certainly fit into a pattern that we've [10:21] been following and we've been saying [10:22] outright that that's part of our policy [10:24] we're not going to allow them to get [10:26] nuclear weapons capability and we're not [10:30] going are you implying that this might [10:31] have been a strike by Israel I'm saying [10:34] that that's one reasonable hypothesis [10:37] given the data that we have at the [10:39] moment now could be America too I mean [10:43] it could be combined it could be lots of [10:46] things it certainly has [10:51] those kind of prints on it as I would [10:57] call it a discussable possibility I'm [10:59] not saying that I don't know we we may [11:03] have done a it may it may have been an [11:05] accident but it would certainly the [11:08] argument that it was done by Israel in [11:11] order to set back their nuclear [11:13] capability so far at least what we have [11:16] in terms of reports would fit into that [11:19] model as well Wow and if and if it was [11:26] done without leaving footprints that [11:30] puts it a little bit more in the [11:31] direction of us than any [11:33] body else because we're pretty good at [11:35] that [11:37] oh well the the Americans might do [11:43] something like that but they don't worry [11:44] about leaving footprints [11:47] in a tent and they tend to make [11:49] statements that's what I mean in other [11:52] words they're they don't have an issue [11:53] of saying hey we did it you don't like [11:55] it - men [11:58] being a superpower gives you that that [12:00] license so so how how does this I mean [12:05] first of all this is just this is yet [12:08] another reminder that that corona virus [12:11] has not paralyzed any activity in this [12:16] regard hasn't paralyzed anything and and [12:19] when you said before that the that the [12:23] inspectors from the from the [12:25] International Atomic Energy have not [12:28] this is not a place they've been allowed [12:30] to visit you're saying that even even [12:31] before the u.s. pulled out of the [12:35] nuclear deal that this was an area that [12:37] even though the nuclear deal ostensibly [12:39] gave full access this in practice this [12:43] is a place that no one was ever allowed [12:44] to visit yeah full the full access of [12:48] the nuclear deal was how can I put it [12:53] neither full nor access it it was you [13:00] know kind of Talmudic you invert the [13:03] verbs and everything works day is night [13:08] night is day and and they complained [13:12] about it's not very reasonably given [13:14] given information that we gave over to [13:16] the International Atomic Energy Agency [13:19] they came to the conclusion that Iran [13:23] has accelerated their weapons [13:25] development significantly in the past in [13:28] the recent past so the headline about [13:32] they're about that I mentioned which [13:35] which was much more under the radar that [13:37] recently there's been reports that that [13:40] their that their enrichment of uranium [13:42] has really reached a critical point [13:45] might be intimately connected with this [13:49] yes explosion in part chain right and [13:53] again is there how how close are there [13:57] are their residents and citizens to this [14:00] area that might be even impacted by such [14:03] a thing you know I don't know the answer [14:06] to that it's it's way out of the city [14:10] so not close and and keep in mind that [14:14] we're not talking about the destruction [14:18] of a reactor we're talking about a [14:21] destruction of facilities that may not [14:24] have a particular nuclear element that [14:28] you know just to use the analogy one [14:31] when we destroyed [14:32] Saddam's nuclear reactor in 1981 was [14:36] before it went online it wasn't a [14:38] nuclear event at all it was a [14:39] destruction of a building that was going [14:40] to go nuclear so they're there whether [14:46] there's nuclear material involved in [14:48] this or not and again this is all [14:49] speculation it doesn't mean that that [14:52] the eruption the explosion itself had a [14:56] necessarily nuclear aspect to it this [14:59] could have been connected to other you [15:02] know even if it was a strike against [15:04] their military capabilities that doesn't [15:06] mean it was nuclear again it could be it [15:08] could be a strike against elements of [15:12] the development of a nuclear capability [15:14] without necessarily taking out or [15:19] destroying or erupting I think is [15:22] because what what we're talking about [15:24] here something massively radioactive or [15:28] or dangerous this this is not a really [15:31] an online reactor blowing up and spewing [15:34] radiation all over the place okay so [15:37] let's bring this around let's bring this [15:38] around to Israel and here's here's my [15:40] question as you're talking about this [15:42] because this is like okay this thing [15:44] happened and of course the Israelis [15:45] never make statements they never show [15:47] their cards what let's say the Iran [15:53] let's let's say that it was an attack by [15:57] the Israelis okay by the Americans right [16:00] what what what interest would Iran have [16:03] in concealing that fact and those why [16:06] isn't it in their best interests to [16:08] actually say that it was an attack by [16:10] the Israelis meaning why wouldn't they [16:11] want to promote that as and then and you [16:14] know as a way of you know maybe [16:19] auditioning themselves as victims or you [16:22] know or or seeing you know saying [16:24] outright that this is a provocation and [16:26] then you know unleashing fizzle out like [16:27] why it was why would they not want it to [16:30] be seen as an attack by the Israelis or [16:33] by the Americans okay because here I [16:36] don't think that Iran is looking to [16:38] fight a diplomatic battle with us or [16:41] with the United States in other words [16:45] what you're suggesting would be to go to [16:50] the quote unquote [16:51] court of public opinion the court of [16:55] public opinion doesn't really care at [16:56] this point [16:57] Europe is fed up with them the Russians [16:59] don't particularly like them they've got [17:03] their allies who are their allies [17:05] regardless showing that they were struck [17:08] actually makes them look weak which is [17:11] not a good thing in the world that they [17:14] live in and I don't mean Muslim but the [17:17] world of power it's it's not it's not [17:20] about Iran or Shiites or Muslims or [17:22] anything like that in the realm of power [17:24] you don't look weak and this they were [17:28] humiliated by the Mossad raid that went [17:32] into their archives if this is shown to [17:35] be again with by whatever means an [17:39] attack that got through all of their [17:42] defenses and caused huge damage if they [17:47] only lose face accidents can happen you [17:52] know a little embarrassing maybe but not [17:55] not as embarrassing as your enemy sneak [17:57] me into one of your most important [18:00] research bases and causing massive [18:03] damage in terms of response here here [18:09] I'm going to come back to something I [18:10] said last time [18:11] the Persians invented chess if you allow [18:15] your adversary to change your timetables [18:21] purely because they irritated you then [18:26] you're letting them take over [18:28] the game okay well one of my ongoing [18:32] sayings is he who sets the pace wins the [18:35] battle it's not exclusively mine it's [18:38] this is true in sports as well [18:44] allowing us to determine when they do [18:47] something is not their style and by the [18:52] way it's one of the arguments in general [18:53] against automatic retaliation I've had [18:58] that issue with us in Gaza and with [19:01] Lebanon if every time they do something [19:03] we respond in a certain way at a certain [19:07] point they are initiating for us and [19:09] deciding for us what we're going to be [19:12] doing that's that's a downside I'm not [19:14] saying they're controlling the pace of [19:17] the game and exactly and and they're [19:20] taking the we've allowed them to take [19:21] the lead in the dance exactly precisely [19:25] now that that's not an argument against [19:27] never retaliating but but because [19:30] there's a price to be paid for for not [19:31] retaliating - exactly but but you have [19:34] to keep in mind there's a price to be [19:36] paid for retaliating every time based on [19:39] what they do that means part of the [19:41] balance of calculating and strategy and [19:44] tactics they're not in a position to do [19:48] something significant right now and I [19:52] can tell you that with certainty because [19:53] if they were they would have done it in [19:54] other words they're not waiting for us [19:56] they're waiting for themselves and [20:01] that's part of what we've been doing in [20:03] Syria for the past few years constantly [20:05] striking every time they they make some [20:07] sort of progress in the forward position [20:09] equipment set up bases we strike them [20:12] now frankly we're doing that brilliantly [20:16] on a tactical level I think [20:17] strategically we're falling behind [20:19] because we're not hitting everything in [20:21] other words even if they're moving ahead [20:24] at 10 15 20 percent of the pace that [20:27] they would like to be moving ahead we're [20:29] not driving them back which are slowing [20:31] down their forward movement and what [20:35] would so you know this this might be a [20:37] good this might be a good a good [20:40] question - you know to bring us really [20:44] into how all this affects Israel and [20:46] maybe you know table some of the you [20:48] know we this is a big conversation about [20:50] Iran right we didn't and we didn't know [20:53] we'd be talking about a recent explosion [20:54] today but right but what you just said [20:57] really [20:58] brings us into you know what we care [21:00] about in terms of going to bed every [21:02] night waking up every morning being [21:03] concerned for Israel praying for Israel [21:05] so the question is what you just said is [21:09] very important tactically we're doing a [21:11] wonderful job [21:12] you know MIT with these surgical strikes [21:14] at Iranian positions in in Syria you [21:17] know when they're trying to move weapons [21:19] across Syria into Lebanon when you know [21:22] you know we're great at knocking them [21:24] out we're slowing down their progress [21:27] but you know if but that strategically [21:33] where we're losing because they are [21:36] making progress at a slow pace so the [21:39] question then is well from a strategic [21:43] standpoint what would you rather see [21:46] Israel doing because you know short of [21:50] of just you know throwing down the [21:52] gauntlet and entering into an all-out [21:54] war what would you like to see Israel do [21:57] strategically to correct that problem no [22:01] I don't think there is a correction I [22:02] think that what we're doing is is the [22:05] best we can do [22:06] quantitatively you can always do a [22:08] little bit more but that's not a [22:10] criticism that's just that that's [22:12] whatever you do you can leave has more [22:14] attack that's just more of the tactical [22:15] or tactics there is the our objective is [22:20] to prevent them from getting to our [22:24] border without going to war [22:27] and I think that this this is a reality [22:32] of democracies in general not to say [22:36] that democracies are perfect but in [22:38] general democracies don't want to go to [22:40] war and we see time and again being [22:47] drawn into Wars and again with mistakes [22:50] and they're always gonna be mistakes and [22:52] bad decisions and that sort of thing but [22:55] being drawn into Wars that in retrospect [22:57] you could say you know what had we done [23:00] something earlier we could have [23:02] prevented this mess and tech world war [23:05] two as a classic example everybody knew [23:10] who the problem was and what the problem [23:12] was and it could have been dealt with in [23:13] 1935 but nobody wanted to go to war [23:16] they'd just gotten out of one and we're [23:19] in the same position I think it's a [23:21] legitimate position going to Wars a bad [23:23] thing so yeah but our enemies use our [23:27] unwillingness to go to war as a [23:29] tremendous advantage because it gives [23:32] them cover to you know just steadily [23:36] rearm and and and and and get themselves [23:40] ready but what you know is it possible [23:42] that's kind of like along the lines of [23:45] of you know of the way Reagan won the [23:49] Cold War that maybe just keeping your [23:52] enemy at bay and kind of staying one [23:55] step ahead of him technologically and [23:58] financially and [24:00] you know and and that and that just if [24:03] you're dealing with an enemy that you [24:05] know is a paper tiger economically that [24:09] that the hope is that if you just keep [24:11] inflicting these little wounds and you [24:13] keep slowing them down that eventually [24:15] they will collapse is that it I mean is [24:18] that strategically a valid way of [24:21] thinking here it's a it it's [24:23] strategically valid although it has a [24:26] certain amount of wishful thinking mixed [24:28] into it for sure yeah oh there's not a [24:31] strategy not exactly it it makes sense [24:37] on a [24:40] certain level and look here here's one [24:43] of those great things you mentioned [24:44] Reagan and and you know the end of the [24:46] Soviet Union it's brilliant if it works [24:52] okay if you're traveling it doesn't look [24:56] so good [24:58] so there is logic to it I think I think [25:04] it's the best strategy we've got because [25:05] we don't want to go to war and we [25:07] certainly don't want to initiate war [25:09] I should also make the point that there [25:13] is a difference and this has come up in [25:15] discussions that I've had with with lots [25:16] of people in lectures and on social [25:19] media there's a huge difference between [25:22] preemption and prevention [25:26] okay prevention is early in other words [25:28] if we went after Iran now it would be [25:30] preventive if we did not like or like [25:34] destroying the Iraqi react reactor was [25:36] bad that was preventive right we did in [25:39] 1967 was pre-emptive they were on the [25:42] borders they were lined up and we [25:44] preempted their strike a pre-emptive [25:47] attack is much more justifiable and I'm [25:50] not just talking about in public opinion [25:52] I'm talking about in logic as well [25:53] because there is a point where the [25:56] wishful thinking just disappears they're [25:58] lying it up and they say they're gonna [25:59] kill you when you say okay you know here [26:00] they are we're not guessing I'm gonna [26:03] shoot them first right that's right okay [26:06] we're preventive is much more [26:11] problematic because hey you don't you [26:14] don't know for sure you're going way [26:16] ahead and in the court of public opinion [26:19] and then the final provocation if you if [26:23] you add opinion in general and here I'm [26:25] talk about domestic as well as foreign [26:27] friends enemies and the like it's much [26:30] more difficult to defend now if it's a [26:33] single strike like taking out the [26:34] nuclear reactor so everybody complains [26:36] but you've done it it's finished [26:37] otherwise but by the time they're [26:40] condemning and it's over the planes are [26:42] home the guys are you know the pilots [26:44] are drinking coffee or whatever they're [26:45] doing after a mission and so okay so I [26:50] did it a war is an entirely different [26:52] story [26:54] and then you're talking about how do [26:59] your allies respond do they justify it [27:01] do they help you do they harm you do [27:03] they cut you off [27:04] do they embargo you and so on and there [27:09] you've got a bigger problem what what [27:11] one of my absolute on laws and by the [27:14] way this one works not only in strategy [27:17] and international relations that works [27:18] um the individual interpersonal level as [27:21] well is that a preventive policy that [27:25] succeeds will always be condemned [27:29] hmm okay now it sounds like a paradox [27:32] but it's not okay in other words if you [27:35] do something to prevent something from [27:37] happening you will be condemned for what [27:39] you did because nothing happened and it [27:42] looked aggressive right well cope you [27:44] you can't prove the negative in other [27:46] words you can't prove that you prevented [27:49] something that's such an important [27:51] insight Eliot we've gone long we've been [27:55] looking so we're gonna continue this [27:57] this is you know one of the things I [28:00] love about what we're doing and I've [28:01] heard from a few people who have been [28:02] watching these videos that we are really [28:05] digging into the you know the full [28:09] picture of what's going on and so much [28:10] happens when we read headlines when we [28:11] read news stories that were just getting [28:14] shallow snip yes and no context well and [28:18] no context because that's just what [28:19] that's the nature of the medium and [28:21] we're doing something much more thorough [28:23] here at the same time we don't want [28:25] these videos to go on too long so we're [28:27] gonna bring we're gonna we're gonna have [28:28] to wrap up here why don't you just send [28:30] us off with what should we expect any [28:34] follow-up in terms of action in terms of [28:37] reaction in terms of it or is this is [28:40] this the kind of explosion and and and [28:42] because of the nature of it that one [28:44] it'll just fade from memory quickly what [28:46] what do you see [28:47] you know if going forward for us if we [28:51] did it and the Iranians would know it [28:54] and this is one of those things also [28:55] where they may never admit it and will [28:56] never admit it but they know that we [28:58] know that we know that they know kind of [28:59] thing they could very well plan a [29:04] terrorist response there I could see [29:06] please Bella not on our border but [29:10] somewhere else against Israeli or Jewish [29:13] targets something on the high seas [29:17] something something cyber and then if it [29:20] works really well they would then say we [29:24] did this in response to what the [29:26] Israelis did [29:29] like that's a possibility [29:31] so if that yet so that would mean that [29:34] for Israel our our defense our defense [29:41] is probably on heightened alert and and [29:45] I think we're going to learn anyway on [29:48] the Nile yeah yeah okay all right [29:50] wonderful all right Elliot we got to [29:52] stop here okay you know again you know [29:55] really I've never played chess I'm not [29:57] very good at chess okay you know and I [30:00] played it when I was very young my kids [30:01] play chess and it's just fascinating to [30:05] hear these you know how this really is [30:07] very much a chess game but I think it's [30:09] also kind of kind of a backgammon game [30:11] where there's strategy but there's also [30:13] some some rolls of the dice involved and [30:15] of course you know so alright thank you [30:18] very much [30:18] Ellie awesome and and you know there's [30:23] so many issues to talk about [30:24] when we talk about what matters to [30:26] Israel and the matters that matter most [30:28] to Israel thank you all of you for you [30:30] know for watching for listening and you [30:33] know please share this tell other people [30:34] about it you know people who are [30:35] concerned with Israel people who really [30:37] want to know how to understand what [30:39] we're going through and what to have in [30:41] mind as we as we continue to pray for [30:44] you know for the State of Israel for the [30:46] people of Israel and for what God is [30:47] doing in the world [30:49] you
Just a few hours before this recording, a massive explosion was reported at a key weapons development site in Iran. Was it the Israelis? Was it just an accident? How does this affect Israel? Defense and security expert Elliot Chodoff and Rabbi Pesach Wolicki unpack this developing story, just after Elliot shares a powerful lesson from Psalm 23.
Subscribe to the newsletter A regular email of new videos and articles from across the site. To hear about this channel on its own, use Follow above.
