Transcript [00:00] Hey everyone. So, I want to talk about [00:03] Gaza and what's going on now because we [00:04] now have the text of a new 15-point [00:08] roadmap for implementing President [00:10] Trump's Gaza peace plan. The the [00:13] document that is supposed to move us [00:15] this new document, this 15-point roadmap [00:18] is supposed to move us from phase one [00:20] into phase two. And I've gone through it [00:22] line by line and I've compared it to the [00:24] original 20-point plan that Israel [00:27] actually agreed to way back when. And [00:30] here's what I found. [00:32] This new document doesn't contradict the [00:35] 20-point plan in any explicit way. It's [00:39] much cleverer than that. What it does [00:42] again and again is it takes something in [00:44] the original plan that was sequential, [00:47] meaning Hamas has to do X or X has to [00:50] happen to Hamas before Israel does Y. [00:54] And it turns it into something parallel [00:57] and simultaneous and negotiated on the [01:00] fly. And it kind of undoes the whole [01:04] purpose of the original 20-point plan. [01:07] And once you see that pattern, you can't [01:09] unsee it. So, if you're trying to figure [01:10] out like, okay, you know something's [01:12] wrong here and you want to put your [01:13] finger on it, that's what we're going to [01:14] go through in this video. We're going to [01:17] go through a few key points. [01:19] So, here we go. Stick around to the end [01:21] because that's where the real punchline [01:24] comes in and you will have clarity on [01:26] where we stand when you hear President [01:28] Trump talking about how we're ready for [01:30] phase two and this is all great and [01:31] we're moving forward with the 20-point [01:32] plan, [01:34] this video will give you clarity on what [01:36] is true and what is some kind of [01:40] misdirection play that is happening with [01:42] pressure on Israel. Okay, so let's hit [01:45] it. Let's pull this up on the screen. [01:47] And we we will start with [01:50] point 13 of the original 20-point plan. [01:54] Okay, so let's pull this up. Here we [01:56] are. Here's the original uh 20-point [01:58] plan. Let's go to point 13. [02:00] Point 13 states as follows, "Hamas and [02:03] other factions agree to not have any [02:06] role in the governance of Gaza [02:09] directly, indirectly, or in any form. [02:11] All military, terror, and offensive [02:13] infrastructure, including tunnels and [02:15] weapons production facilities, will be [02:17] destroyed and not rebuilt. [02:19] There will be a process of [02:21] demilitarization of Gaza under the [02:23] supervision of independent monitors, [02:25] which will include placing weapons [02:27] permanently beyond use through an agreed [02:31] process of decommissioning [02:33] uh and then it talks about who's going [02:35] to who's going to who's going to help [02:37] with that. [02:38] Uh but the point I want to make here is [02:40] this. [02:41] Notice the words. It says destroyed, not [02:44] rebuilt, permanently beyond use. That's [02:47] what Israel signed on to. Now, let's [02:49] compare that to this new to this new [02:51] document called the roadmap. That's what [02:53] we'll call it. Roadmap article eight. [02:55] Okay, so article eight of the roadmap [02:57] reads as follows. [02:59] "A process to decommission and store [03:02] heavy weapons, military production [03:04] sites, depots of weapons, and tunnels [03:07] shall begin after completing the [03:09] remaining commitments under Sharm [03:11] el-Sheikh protocol, [03:13] the entry of the National Committee for [03:15] the Administration of Gaza, the NCAG, [03:17] and the deployment of the ISF, the [03:20] International Stabilization Force." [03:22] Okay, so what just happened here? [03:24] Here it says that the weapons are to be [03:26] decommissioned and stored, not [03:28] destroyed, stored. And it only begins [03:32] after the political handover, after this [03:35] new body, the NCAG, enters Gaza, and [03:39] after the international in the [03:40] international force is already deployed. [03:44] So, the sequence is flipped. In the [03:46] original plan, disarmament was the [03:47] prerequisite for everything else, and in [03:50] the roadmap, the political transition [03:52] happens first, and the disarmament is a [03:55] process that follows on its own [03:57] timetable. And I'm not the only one who [03:59] caught this. Someone who I don't usually [04:01] quote, and I'm not a huge fan of, Itamar [04:03] Ben-Gvir. Again, I I agree with some [04:05] things on him, but I I generally am not [04:08] a fan. Uh Itamar Ben-Gvir already came [04:10] out and said exactly what every Israeli [04:13] should be thinking watching this. If you [04:15] store weapons instead of destroying [04:18] them, [04:20] under Palestinian control, [04:22] I mean, you store them under Palestinian [04:24] control, what's to stop them from being [04:25] used again? He's actually, you know, [04:28] Ben-Gvir actually pushed to have them [04:29] moved out of Gaza to Egypt. It's not a, [04:31] you know, this is [04:34] Look, the plain reading of the word [04:36] store, right? Store them. They're not [04:39] being destroyed. Um you know, there's a [04:41] a Middle East expert, a senior [04:43] researcher at the Jerusalem Center for [04:45] Security and Foreign Affairs, really one [04:47] of the premier [04:48] think tanks in Israel, named Yoni Ben [04:50] Menachem. [04:51] And just a couple days ago, uh he [04:53] pointed out that the drafts that are [04:55] circulating uh of this uh of this [04:59] of this um road map aren't describing [05:02] the removal of weapons at all. They're [05:04] describing collecting them. [05:06] And this is what it kind of says here, [05:07] storing them. Gathering the weapons and [05:09] concentrating them [05:11] at an agreed location inside the Gaza [05:14] Strip, guarded by the Board of Peace, [05:17] inside Gaza. [05:18] And then he made the point that really [05:20] matters. He said, "The strongest [05:21] military force in roughly in the roughly [05:24] 30% of the strip that Hamas still [05:26] controls is Hamas's own military wing." [05:30] Which means that even if Hamas hands [05:33] over part of its weapons, at any given [05:36] moment, it can simply take that storage [05:37] site back by force. You're not disarming [05:40] them. You're not disarming Hamas by [05:42] asking them to put their guns in a room [05:44] down the hall, and hoping that they [05:46] don't go in and and and break the door [05:48] down and take them back. [05:50] And by the way, article nine of the road [05:52] map uh adds something in that the [05:55] original 20-point plan [05:58] um never had. It says [06:01] that [06:02] check this out. It says that personal [06:05] weapons in Gaza shall be subject to the [06:08] regulations of relevant Palestinian laws [06:14] administered by the NCAG. So, personal [06:18] weapons in Gaza [06:20] and the original plan called for full [06:22] demilitarization of Gaza. Okay? [06:25] All right, let's move on to another [06:26] point. Let's talk about the [06:28] international stabilization force and [06:30] let's pull this let's pull up now clause [06:33] 15 of the original 20-point plan and it [06:35] reads as follows. [06:37] The United States [06:40] um [06:41] actually before we get to it, let me [06:42] just say I think that this is the this [06:45] is one that um might be the most [06:47] consequential discrepancy here. Okay? [06:51] Here we go. [06:55] The United States will work with Arab [06:57] and international partners [06:59] to develop a temporary international [07:01] stabilization force [07:02] to immediately deploy in Gaza. [07:05] The ISF will train and provide support [07:07] to vetted Palestinian police forces in [07:09] Gaza and will consult with Jordan and [07:12] Egypt who have extensive experience [07:14] in this field. [07:16] This force will be the long-term [07:19] internal security solution. The ISF will [07:22] work with Israel and Egypt to help [07:25] secure border areas along with and that [07:27] means border areas [07:29] um between Gaza and Egypt. That's why it [07:31] says Israel and Egypt. [07:33] To help secure border areas along with [07:35] newly trained Palestinian police forces. [07:37] It is critical to prevent munitions from [07:39] entering Gaza and to facilitate the [07:42] rapid and secure flow of goods to [07:43] rebuild and revitalize Gaza, a [07:45] de-confliction mechanism will be agreed [07:47] upon [07:48] by the parties. [07:51] Okay. [07:53] Let's Let's read that line again. This [07:55] force will will be the long-term [07:58] internal security solution. That means [08:00] that the ISF's job [08:02] was to be the mechanism or supposed to [08:04] be the mechanism that keeps Gaza secure [08:06] on the inside. Okay, training the [08:09] police, working with Israel, it says, [08:11] and Egypt on the border. Actually [08:13] managing security together. [08:15] So, Israel's written into this sentence. [08:17] Israel's a partner with the ISF in in in [08:21] its mission. [08:22] And they're maintaining internal [08:24] security in Gaza. [08:26] Now, let's compare that to article 12 of [08:29] the road map. Here's article 12 of the [08:31] road map. Let's jump down. Here we are. [08:34] The temporary international [08:36] stabilization force shall be deployed in [08:38] the Gaza Strip to separate [08:40] the Israeli forces from the NCAG [08:43] controlled areas. [08:45] The ISF shall not perform any police [08:47] mission or missions related to the [08:49] Palestinian society. [08:51] Furthermore, it shall monitor compliance [08:53] by all parties with the ceasefire, train [08:55] the Palestinian police, secure the [08:57] protection and delivery of humanitarian [08:58] assistance and essential supplies into [09:00] the Gaza Strip, and support the NCAG [09:03] at its request in any other non-policing [09:06] mission. [09:08] Hmm. [09:10] What happened here? [09:12] Look at that. [09:15] It's supposed to separate the Israeli [09:16] forces. That's the purpose of the ISF, [09:19] according to the road map. And notice [09:21] the second sentence. The ISF shall not [09:23] perform any police mission related to [09:25] Palestinian society. So, here the ISF [09:28] went from being the long-term internal [09:30] security solution, [09:32] and now it's not the internal security [09:34] solution anymore. Internal security is [09:35] handled entirely by a Palestinian police [09:38] force under the NCAG. [09:40] A force that Israel has no role in [09:42] training, vetting, or working with in an [09:44] ongoing way. [09:48] Because Israel's been been moved to the [09:50] other side of the ISF line cuz now the [09:52] ISF is a is like a it's like UNIFIL, [09:55] like in between [09:57] Israel and this Palestinian police force [10:00] that's on the other side. The ISF's job, [10:02] according to this document, is to sit [10:04] between the IDF [10:06] and the Palestinian police. [10:08] See what happened there? [10:10] In the original plan, the ISF was the [10:11] long-term internal security solution. It [10:13] worked with Israel to deliver it. In the [10:16] road map, the ISF has been redefined as [10:18] a wall. [10:19] It's whole purpose to separate Israel [10:21] from the Gazan security apparatus that [10:24] Israel now has nothing to do with. [10:26] And that's of course where all the [10:27] weapons are stored on the other side. [10:29] This is not a shrinking of Israel's role [10:32] here. It's a removal of Israel's role [10:34] and a buffer force that restrains [10:38] both sides equally, which means [10:39] basically that the day there's a terror [10:41] cell rebuilding in Gaza, the ISF will [10:45] will complicate matters for Israel and [10:47] exist precisely to stand in the way of [10:49] Israel doing something about it. It's [10:51] not going to help Israel do something [10:52] about it. [10:54] And remember, this still doesn't answer [10:55] the question that I've been asking since [10:56] the beginning of this whole thing, since [10:57] the since the 20-point plan came out. [10:59] And if you've been watching this channel [11:01] and Israel 365 news channel, you've [11:02] heard me talk about this forever. [11:04] That no one has any clue who is actually [11:08] taking the weapons away from Hamas. The [11:09] road map doesn't answer this question [11:11] either. [11:12] And it what it's doing in this clause [11:14] though is it's writing Israel out of the [11:16] internal security picture instead of [11:18] being cooperating with the internal [11:20] security force, the ISF. [11:22] Now, that brings up a question that that [11:25] that no one wants to answer directly. If [11:27] the ISF is not the internal security [11:29] solution anymore, again, it was in the [11:31] 20-point plan and now it's not. [11:33] If it's so if it's not it doesn't play [11:35] that role, and it's not allowed to have [11:37] anything to do with policing, [11:39] then who's actually going to [11:41] take Hamas's weapons away? [11:43] So, Yoav Ben Menachem also talked about [11:45] this, and I think he said something very [11:48] astute. [11:49] He said, "What's actually being built [11:52] right now is a force of thousands of [11:55] Palestinian Authority police who are [11:57] being trained in Egypt over several [11:58] months, [11:59] and being prepared to come to become the [12:02] controlling security force inside Gaza. [12:04] This is not a new neutral technocratic [12:07] body made up of of troops from other [12:09] friendly nations. That's the ISF, but [12:11] the ISF not the police anymore. [12:13] Originally, they were. So, originally [12:15] the ISF was going to be you know, again, [12:17] friendly with Israel, working with [12:19] Israel to maintain security internally. [12:21] Now, there's this new Palestinian police [12:24] force inside, which is basically the [12:26] Palestinian Authority 2.0. [12:30] Coming into Gaza dressed up under a new [12:32] name called the NCAG. So, instead of [12:34] being called the Palestinian Authority, [12:35] it's called the NCAG, but it's the same [12:37] thing. [12:38] And he put it in a way I really [12:40] appreciated cuz it's it's a good [12:41] expression in Hebrew. He said, "We went [12:43] from [12:45] a nevelah to a treif. These are two [12:47] Hebrew words that refer to two different [12:49] types of of of non-kosher meat who that [12:53] are that are non-kosher for different [12:55] reasons. And the point being that you [12:57] can swap the label, but you haven't made [12:59] anything kosher. You know, so Hamas [13:01] ruling Gaza was the problem. Handing [13:04] Gaza to the Palestinian Authority, [13:07] whose corruption and incitement and the [13:10] pay-for-slay policies helped create the [13:12] conditions for October 7th in the first [13:15] place, this is not going to solve [13:16] anything. It's it's really just dressing [13:18] up the problem in a new name. Okay, [13:20] let's go to the third issue, and that is [13:22] Palestinian statehood. So, let's see how [13:25] Palestinian statehood let's first take a [13:27] look at how Palestinian statehood is [13:29] mentioned in the original 20-point plan. [13:31] It comes all the way at the end. All the [13:33] way at the end. And the 20-point plan is [13:35] sequential. [13:37] You you when you read the 20-point plan, [13:38] it's very clear. It's a sequential plan. [13:41] But look at how it's dealt with. [13:43] While Gaza redeployment [13:45] I'm sorry. While Gaza redevelopment [13:47] advances and when the PA, if Palestinian [13:49] authority reform program is faithfully [13:52] carried out, the conditions may finally [13:56] be in place for a credible pathway to [13:58] Palestinian self-determination and [14:00] statehood, which we recognize as the [14:02] aspiration of the Palestinian people. [14:05] Okay? That's the clause there. [14:08] It meaning it may the conditions may [14:10] finally be in place after redevelopment, [14:13] after the PA faithfully completes a real [14:16] reform program that is far down the road [14:19] and is very conditional. Now look at [14:21] what Palestinian statehood shows up in [14:23] this new road map. It's not at the end. [14:26] It's not point 19 of 20 or point 14 of [14:29] 15 or whatever. [14:30] It's at the very beginning. It's in [14:32] principle number one of the road map. [14:36] All the way at the beginning. Here we [14:37] are. [14:39] All parties reaffirm their commitment to [14:41] President Trump's comprehensive plan to [14:42] achieve peace in Gaza. That's the [14:44] 20-point plan. [14:45] Which constitutes together with UN [14:47] Security Council Resolution 2803, the [14:49] agreed-upon international framework [14:51] guiding the implementation of this [14:52] process. Through this process, the [14:54] parties aim at ending the cycle of [14:55] destruction, securing the complete [14:57] Israeli withdrawal of the Gaza Strip, [14:59] restoring normal life, enabling [15:01] Palestinian governance, reconstruction, [15:03] security, recovery, and economic [15:04] development. Rehabilitating damaged [15:07] sectors and facilitate launching a [15:08] credible political path that achieves [15:10] self-determination and statehood. And [15:12] that's so interesting. They put it right [15:13] at the very beginning. [15:16] It's listed as one of the core aims of [15:17] the entire process right up front [15:19] alongside reconstruction and security. [15:21] And then in Article 8, the same article [15:24] about weapons, it ties the statehood [15:28] to the it ties the statehood pathway to [15:31] the completion of the decommissioning [15:34] process. [15:35] Check this out. A process to [15:37] decommission and store heavy weapons, [15:39] military production sites, depots of [15:41] weapons, and tunnels shall begin after [15:44] the completion after completing the [15:46] remaining commitments under the Sharm [15:47] el-Sheikh protocol. [15:50] The at the entry of the NCAG and the [15:51] deployment of the ISF. And then, let me [15:54] find it. [15:56] Uh here. The implementation of this road [15:58] map, including the issue of weapons and [16:00] other articles of the comprehensive [16:02] peace plan, shall create appropriate [16:04] conditions for a credible pathway [16:06] towards achieving Palestinian [16:07] self-determination and statehood. [16:11] Hm. [16:12] So, the Palestinian Authority reform [16:15] requirement, [16:16] I didn't see that there. I didn't see [16:18] that in clause one, I didn't see that in [16:19] clause [16:20] in clause eight. The two places in this [16:22] new road map that talk about creating a [16:24] credible pathway to Palestinian [16:25] statehood do not mention the reform of [16:28] the Palestinian Authority, which was [16:31] mentioned multiple times in the 20-point [16:32] plan. Once there at the end in 19, and [16:35] once earlier when it says that the [16:36] Palestinian Authority is not going to be [16:37] involved until they reform. [16:41] So, that was supposed to be the real [16:42] gate. [16:43] The real and that was what Israel needs [16:46] in order to feel secure that if we're [16:48] going to move forward with some sort of [16:49] Palestinian [16:50] autonomy or self-determination, we have [16:53] to know that they've reformed because [16:54] they are at at this point the [16:55] Palestinian Authority is a terrorist [16:57] entity, and we need them to reform [16:58] themselves. So, now statehood has been [17:01] moved from a distant conditional [17:04] aspiration to a structural goal that is [17:07] not that does not is not conditioned on [17:09] any reform whatsoever. That's a massive [17:11] shift. [17:12] And and it it whatever that's that's a [17:15] huge discrepancy between these two. [17:17] Again, all everything I'm saying in this [17:19] video is that there's [17:21] the original 20-point Trump plan is not [17:23] this. [17:25] What's happening now is not what Israel [17:26] agreed to. [17:28] Um and here's confirmation of how [17:29] central that is, not from Israel, but [17:31] from Hamas itself. Again, I'm going back [17:33] to Yoni Ben Menachem's report. It was [17:34] very interesting. He pointed out that in [17:36] Hamas's own public statements about this [17:38] road map over the last few days, they [17:40] explicitly say that the whole plan is [17:43] conditioned on political processes [17:45] toward the establishment of a [17:46] Palestinian state. So, Hamas is telling [17:48] you out loud that statehood isn't a [17:50] distant hope tacked onto the end of this [17:53] process for good measure. It's the price [17:55] of admission that they're demanding [17:58] right now in order to move forward. So, [18:01] when if if Hamas tells you [18:05] that [18:06] you know, and again, they're just um [18:08] the disarmament of Hamas is the whole [18:10] purpose of this process. [18:12] If they're the ones insisting on this [18:14] clause about statehood, that should tell [18:16] you everything about [18:17] uh you know, about this clause. Now, let [18:19] me give you one more because I think it [18:21] might be the most important one in the [18:22] whole document. [18:24] Maybe I said that about one of the other [18:25] ones. All right. Article three. [18:28] Article three. [18:30] Um let's go to article three. [18:33] Article three of the 20-point plan. [18:35] Okay? Article three. [18:41] No, I'm sorry. Article three of the [18:42] Sorry, of this document. Sorry. Article [18:44] three [18:45] states as follows. [18:47] Progression from one phase to the [18:48] following one shall be contingent upon [18:51] the verified completion of the [18:52] commitments of the previous phase. Okay? [18:54] So, it's sequential. [18:56] This verification shall be done by the [18:58] IVC, which is the International [19:01] Verification Committee or something, [19:03] which shall also observe any violations [19:05] by either party through an enhanced [19:08] monitoring mechanism. [19:11] Okay? [19:12] So, article So, that's what it says [19:13] there. It says progression from phase [19:15] phase to phase depends on verified [19:17] compliance. [19:18] Verify the verification is done by the [19:20] international verification committee. [19:22] Who sits on it? Who sits on this [19:24] committee? Well, representatives of the [19:26] guarantors. Who are the guarantors? [19:29] Well, according to the people running [19:31] this process, [19:32] the guarantors are the US, Egypt, Qatar, [19:35] Turkey, and the UAE. Qatar and Turkey. [19:39] Now, I've spent a lot of time over the [19:41] last [19:42] 6 months, year, [19:44] um documenting on this channel on Israel [19:47] 365, going in detail, talking about [19:49] Qatar's financing of Hamas, Turkey's [19:51] opening [19:53] uh open hosting of Hamas leadership, [19:55] Erdogan calling Hamas freedom fighters. [19:57] And now those governments, Qatar and [19:59] Turkey, are on the committee that [20:01] decides whether Hamas has complied. [20:05] I mean, talk about the fox and the [20:08] henhouse, right? And now, before we even [20:10] get to whether this document is good, [20:12] there's a more basic question. [20:14] Cuz I've already showed you how bad it [20:16] is, but here's the problem. [20:19] Again, according to Yoni Ben Menachem, [20:22] here's what he found when he checked. [20:24] Beyond President Trump's announcement [20:26] and and Mallazdenov, and you know, the [20:27] the official announcement that it's been [20:29] agreed to, there's no confirmation that [20:31] Hamas actually signed this agreement. [20:34] Uh in fact, uh he says that on Hamas's [20:36] own channels, and he reads them in [20:38] Arabic, he he checks in on Hamas all the [20:40] time. On Hamas's own channels, there is [20:42] no agreement and no confirmation of what [20:45] Trump said. On the contrary, Hamas is [20:47] actually saying that if there is an [20:49] agreement, it will only happen after [20:51] Israel first announces that it accepted [20:54] the plan proposed by the mediators. [20:57] Okay? Think about that. Hamas is [20:58] conditioning its own agreement to this [21:02] on Israel first committing in public [21:04] before Hamas has even stated its [21:06] position. Okay? This is all backwards. [21:08] According to the 20-point plan, Hamas [21:09] isn't even doesn't even have a say. [21:11] They're just supposed to be disarmed and [21:12] removed. [21:15] Okay, Trump announces the deal. [21:17] Hamas is now saying, "Well, we're going [21:19] to reserve the right to say yes or no, [21:20] depending on what Israel does." [21:22] So, keep all of this in mind as you [21:24] watch how how confidently this is all [21:26] being sold to us. [21:27] And and and look, you don't even have to [21:28] take my word for it. Nickolay Mladenov, [21:31] the international community's head guy, [21:33] the head of this board of peace who's [21:34] supposed to be [21:36] you know, the point man on this whole [21:37] thing, [21:38] he posted this on X [21:42] on the day that the road map was [21:43] announced. Here's this post from him. [21:45] Take Check this out. [21:48] Um I'm just going to read you one line [21:49] of the post cuz that's the key. [21:51] He talks about how wonderful this is. [21:53] What the agreement says matters. What [21:54] happens next matters even more, blah [21:56] blah blah. Withdrawal, meaning IDF [21:59] withdrawal, must move in lockstep with [22:02] decommissioning, meaning with de- [22:04] meaning with disarming Hamas. [22:06] Let me read it again. Withdrawal must [22:09] move in lockstep [22:11] with decommissioning. [22:14] Huh? [22:16] Not withdrawal after decommissioning. [22:19] Lockstep, meaning in parallel. [22:21] Meaning simultaneous. [22:24] What I've been saying throughout this [22:25] video, that there's a shift in this [22:27] sequencing that I just walked you [22:29] through, this is confirmed in his words. [22:33] Israel already knows what this means in [22:35] practice. An Israeli official was on i24 [22:37] news the other day and said that there [22:38] will be no withdrawal from the yellow [22:41] line. There will be no Israeli IDF [22:42] withdrawal whatsoever before Hamas is [22:45] genuinely disarmed. So, it's good that [22:47] Israel's staking out that position. [22:50] Uh and that's and that's of course a [22:51] direct rejection of what Mladenov just [22:53] wrote here in this in this X post. [22:55] Um that's In other words, the sequencing [22:58] fight. [22:59] This is as I I to Let's let's be smart, [23:02] okay? Let's as we watch the headlines [23:04] and as we watch all the statements about [23:06] this in the coming days, [23:08] what we're going to watch for is the [23:09] sequencing issue, okay? Because that's [23:12] what this you know, I said at the [23:13] beginning of the video that it's very [23:15] crafty because this new framework, this [23:17] new roadmap doesn't explicitly [23:19] contradict the 20-point plan, [23:21] but it functionally contradicts it by [23:23] changing the sequencing of things. So, [23:24] that's what we're going to watch for. [23:26] Every one of these changes, [23:28] decommissioning the weapons instead of [23:30] destroying them, personal weapons being [23:32] allowed to remain, the ISF being [23:35] repositioned as a buffer instead of a [23:37] partner, the Palestinian Authority um [23:40] not having to reform itself and being [23:42] being brought back in under a different [23:44] name, the NCAG, statehood being promoted [23:48] at the front of the agreement instead of [23:49] being a conditional aspiration at the [23:52] end of of the agreement. Uh Hamas's main [23:55] patrons, Turkey and Qatar, are sitting [23:57] on the body that verifies [24:00] you know, that verifies whether [24:02] everyone's complying. [24:04] All of these things move this document [24:06] away from what Israel agreed to [24:09] in the 20-point plan. Not with any [24:11] explicit contradiction, but with a you [24:14] know, with a thousand it's death by a [24:15] thousand cuts that end up being a [24:18] completely different plan. [24:19] And we don't even know if Hamas has [24:21] actually agreed to anything or is just [24:23] watching how Israel behaves before it [24:25] decides its next move. [24:27] So, I'll say I've said this from the [24:28] beginning and I'm going to say it again. [24:30] Israel must insist that the 20-point [24:33] plan that it agreed to way back last [24:35] fall be implemented exactly as written [24:38] in the order it was written, not [24:40] renegotiated, [24:41] not you know, you know, you know, clause [24:43] by clause. That's what Israel must [24:46] insist on and and that is So, that's my [24:49] take on where we are right now and um [24:52] let's just you know, let's keep you [24:54] know, let's pray that our leaders uh [24:56] know how to hold their ground and insist [24:59] and I think that the Israeli messaging [25:00] should be to hold up the original [25:02] 20-point plan and say this is what we [25:04] agreed to. All right, thanks for [25:05] watching. Please like, share, subscribe, [25:08] tell others about what we're doing on [25:09] this channel if you find this helpful [25:10] and drop a comment. Let me know what you [25:12] thought. [25:13] God bless.
